Thursday, 30 June 2022

Fleetzero begins its search for the first giant ship to convert to battery power

Fleetzero has an ambitious goal: to compete with global shipping companies with its own boats, powered entirely by electricity. The company just secured $15.5 million in new funding and is looking for the first ship to convert to run on its shipping container-shaped batteries.

The company’s plan, described in detail here, is to convert existing ships to electric propulsion, replacing the diesel engine or generator with enormous batteries of the company’s own design. These would be loaded and unloaded like any other cargo, swapped out at ports and charged between journeys. Done right (and it seems likely that’s the way they’re trying to do it) a ship doing this can handle some of the longest and most popular routes across the Pacific.

But though it all sounds good in theory, obviously at some point you need to put these theories on the water, and that’s the next step for the company. Fortunately, co-founders Steven Henderson and Mike Carter have backgrounds in shipping and shipbuilding and are excited to jump in.

While Fleetzero’s tech could eventually power ships in the 700-foot range, it makes sense to start with something a little smaller, but that also benefits from battery power.

“Companies across the spectrum have reached out for us across industries — not just container shipping,” said Henderson. “So we’ve been going through the list of the biggest auxiliary ship companies, like supply vessels for oil and gas companies, and research vessels, and saying: all right, we’ve got this tech, and our goal is eventually to go do our own cargo, but we want to prove it out with a partner so we don’t have to spend millions on the first ship.”

Surprisingly, this “want to give us a boat?” pitch went over quite well. “People are so interested in our batteries that they’re willing to pay us to test them,” Henderson added. Ultimately Fleetzero plans to make their own boats, but that’s a long-term goal.

It helps to understand that there’s a real variety in ocean-going vessels and their operators. Some big companies own and operate, some only own or only operate, some have fleets for short term hire, and so on. The possibility of electrifying their ships has a different charm to all these, though some are more likely to bite first.

One of those better prospects is the “auxiliary” category of ships mentioned earlier: these are things like research vessels, ships that go out and inspect offshore wind farms, and other tasks that take a serious boat and crew but aren’t the hyper-specialized bulk movers of container ships. Many of these ships are already partially electrified — they use electric motors powered by diesel generators. It sounds like the worst of both worlds, but I’m sure they have their reasons — and more importantly, they’re really easy to convert to Fleetzero’s battery tech.

“It’s minimum scope; the conversion itself takes a matter of weeks, and it doesn’t involve a dry dock,” said Henderson. “In the best case, a PSV [platform supply vessel] about 250 feet long, we put our batteries on the back deck and just wire them in.”

You really just swap out the engine and put the batteries there. Not to scale. Image Credits: Fleetzero

Such a conversion would be an important proof of concept; though the company has plenty of inbound, there are surely doubters out there who would like to see a working vessel before committing any resources.

Carter noted that Fleetzero is one of relatively few companies attempting to really move the needle in shipping. Though logistics and supply chain economics certainly have their share of innovation on the data and services side, the ships and shipping companies themselves have stagnated.

In fact, he pointed out, the White House recently issued a report lamenting that “three global alliances, made up entirely of foreign companies, control almost all of ocean freight shipping.” And when they say almost all, they mean it: we’re talking 95 percent of some critical trade lines. The feds will be looking into price fixing (and in fact just passed a law), but supporting a sustainable American alternative is kind of a no-brainer as well.

It’s hard to challenge such a dominant set of incumbents (which may well be termed a cartel at this point), and Fleetzero can’t make any claims to doing so as a fresh new startup, but their approach neatly avoids the most direct competition.

The electrified ships the company builds with shipping partners will operate in parallel to traditional lines, using smaller ports inaccessible to huge container ships. This saves time (less waiting for a spot at the docks) and money (cities with disused ports are excited to reactivate them), and makes for a robust network of charging and offloading stations across the pacific. Of course, they’ll need to make some friends in southeast Asia as well.

The new funding was led by Breakthrough Energy Ventures, the Bill Gates-led venture group that the man himself talked about recently at TC Sessions: Climate. Apparently they were big on due diligence — it shouldn’t be a surprise, but there it is.

BEV wasn’t alone, though; Founders Fund, McKinley Capital, and previous investors also contributed. Carter said that McKinley, based in Alaska, was an important one to get since of course the state makes up a huge portion of the Pacific U.S. coast.

The money will be crucial for building out and testing the first ship, but Fleetzero is also hiring — they had 1,500 applicants for 10 positions after they came out of stealth. It suggests a lot of people in the shipping world are interested in the company, or perhaps a lot of people at other companies are interested in the shipping world.



from TechCrunch
via Click me for Details

The SEC rejected bitcoin spot ETFs again. Now what?

As governments worldwide continue to eye the crypto industry, some digital asset managers are pushing back against regulators in an effort to provide more legal investing opportunities.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday rejected Grayscale Investments’ application to convert its bitcoin trust (GBTC) into an exchange-traded fund (ETF). Shortly thereafter, the firm — one of the largest digital asset managers, with around $20 billion in assets under management — filed a lawsuit against the SEC.

The SEC also denied Bitwise Asset Management’s application for a spot bitcoin ETF that day.

The SEC’s decisions aren’t a first for the industry; the government agency has denied over a dozen bitcoin spot ETFs in the past year alone while approving several bitcoin future-based ETFs.


TechCrunch+ is having an Independence Day sale! Save 50% on an annual subscription here. (More on TechCrunch+ here if you need it!)


“Spot bitcoin ETFs trade based on the price of bitcoin itself, while futures-based ETFs trade based on the price of CME’s bitcoin futures product, which in turn is tied to an index,” Ken Goodwin, director of regulatory and institutional affairs at Blockchain Intelligence Group, told TechCrunch. “Bitcoin ETFs proponents argue that the futures markets are still based on the underlying spot bitcoin price, while the SEC notes that CME’s futures market is regulated by the [Commodity Futures Trading Commission].”

The SEC allows traders to bet on the value of bitcoin through CME’s bitcoin futures contract, a U.S. dollar cash-settled contract that serves as a once-a-day reference rate of the value of bitcoin in U.S. dollars, according to global markets company CME Group.

Craig Salm, chief legal officer at Grayscale, said on a Twitter Spaces that the SEC once denied both futures and spot bitcoin ETFs, at least “treating them fairly.”

But that was in 2017.

More recently, the SEC has continued to approve both long and short exposure bitcoin futures ETFs while denying spot bitcoin ETFs from coming to the market, Michael Sonnenshein, CEO at Grayscale Investments, said to TechCrunch. “That disparate treatment is in fact one of the most important arguments underpinning our lawsuit.”

Since the defendant of the case is a regulator, it will go to an appellate court and a decision should be finalized within nine to 12 months, Sonnenshein told Reuters.

The SEC’s rejection cites concerns about market manipulation and the lack of a surveillance-sharing agreement between a “regulated market of significant size” and a regulated exchange, Goodwin said. “This echoes concerns that the regulator has expressed for years in terms of rejecting other bitcoin ETF applications.”

GBTC holds 3.5% of all bitcoin in circulation, and its shares are the largest and most liquid publicly traded crypto exchange-traded products, Ryan Selkis, founder and CEO of Messari, wrote in a report. “Grayscale products are like ETFs, but not actually ETFs,” Selkis wrote.

“It’s crystal clear the SEC is simply not going to approve a spot bitcoin ETF until they have regulatory oversight of crypto exchanges,” Nate Geraci, president of The ETF Store, said to TechCrunch. “Even with the specter of a Grayscale lawsuit — and it’s a lawsuit that appears to have at least some validity — the SEC didn’t flinch in denying these spot bitcoin ETF filings.”



from TechCrunch
via Click me for Details

Raspberry Pi introduces a $6 board with Wi-Fi

Everyone’s favorite versatile microcontroller maker, Raspberry Pi, just unveiled a handful of new, budget-minded products. The company is building on the success of its $4 Pico board, which has thus far moved just under two million units since its January 2021 launch.

The new Pico W is launching today for $6 — the “W” (and additional $2) brings 802.11 Wi-Fi connectivity to the system. The $5 Pico H adds a pre-populated header for interefacting with other systems; the Pico WH ($7) gets you both. The first two are available right now, while WH is shipping at some point in August.

As the company notes, its boards have found a lot of success beyond their initial hobbyist and educational focus, as companies have begun to intregrate the controllers directly into their products. More than once in the wild I’ve seen some sophisticated pieces of machinary being controlled by these inexpensive systems.

Interestingly, the company notes that the chip shortage has been a huge boon for sales to third-party manufacturers. “We always believed that [Pi Pico] was a great fit for commercial and industrial applications, but the global semiconductor shortage has vastly accelerated adoption,” founder Eben Upton notes in a post. “With millions of units on hand today, and pipeline in place for tens of millions more, design engineers who have been let down by their current suppliers have a perfect excuse to experiment.”

The addition of wireless opens the system to all manner of interesting, networked IoT/smart devices. And the price is certainly right for the company to sell a couple million more of these things by this time next year.



from TechCrunch
via Click me for Details

Here’s Carta’s response to venture becoming more global

Equity service platform Carta has acquired Vauban, an online platform that helps investors back private companies from end to end. As first reported by The Information, the deal was framed by Carta as a way to support investors of all sizes, from the sub-million-dollar level into the billions of dollars worth of dry powder.

Carta said that it is not disclosing any details beyond what it wrote in a blog post, meaning that the price of the deal will remain unknown. The entire full-time Vauban team is joining Carta, the company says.

The acquisition, closed today, is yet another example of the expanding competitive surface area between Carta and AngelList, two platforms that are racing to build a software suite that solves some of venture capital-backed startups’ key pain points.

Last year, AngelList Venture launched AngelList Stack, a new suite of products that will compete with Carta in providing services to help founders start, operate and maintain ownership over their companies. The new software covers four bases: incorporation, business banking, adviser equity grants and cap table management. (Stripe’s Atlas service offers some related tooling, meaning that the market for helping founders set up and run their business is hot.)

Now, Carta is biting back against the competition; the platform appears to be eyeing AngelList Venture’s investor-focused operations with its Vauban deal.

Vauban created a fully automated platform for syndicate leads and fund managers, per Carta, leading to over 400 investment vehicles to date. The company also manages over $1 billion in invested capital, according to its new corporate parent.

AngelList Venture, meanwhile, said that $3.6 billion has been invested into funds and syndicates, according to its 2021 year in review. There are at least 800 investment vehicles on the platform, the same report says. It is far older than Vauban.

The biggest difference between the two platforms is that Vauban is loudly focused on European venture capital and startups, while AngelList isn’t as explicit. The international angle seems to be exactly what landed Carta’s interest in the first place.

Vrushali Paunikar, VP of product for investor services at Carta, wrote in a blog post that more than 50% of SPVs and funds in the U.S. have at least one non-U.S. LP, according to Carta data.

“Venture is global,” Paunikar wrote. “On one combined platform, syndicate leads and fund managers can now launch funds from the U.S., U.K., British Virgin Islands, and soon, from Luxembourg. More importantly, they can accept LP capital from anywhere in the world.”

In 2020, Carta cut 16% of its staff, or 161 roles, during a period when many venture-backed startups were trimming headcount. Crunchbase data indicates that Carta has raised $1.1 billion to date, including a massive $500 million round last August led by Silver Lake. At that time, the company was valued around $7.4 billion, per the same data source. Given its massive valuation and presumably comfortable cash position, the Vauban deal might not be the last that we see from the company.



from TechCrunch
via Click me for Details

As the NFT boom fades, major gaming companies slow their crypto plans

Blockchain games and NFTs in video games were a hot topic toward the end of 2021, and they continue to be so, spurred by the early success of Axie Infinity’s play-to-earn (P2E) model. After all, it’s hard to ignore a sector that’s playing with billions of dollars.

The potential of Axie’s P2E model, which gives players ownership of collectible in-game items (tokens) that they can sell for actual money, was immediately apparent. Its success showed the potential economic rewards of combining blockchain technology and gaming, and spurred a slew of smaller developers to put out similar offerings. More notably, it also led to established video game studios trying to elbow their way in.

And they tried hard indeed. Between November and February, video game giants, from Ubisoft and Sega to Square Enix, all signaled their intention to cash in on the NFT craze.


TechCrunch+ is having an Independence Day sale! Save 50% on an annual subscription here.
(More on TechCrunch+ here if you need it!)


Their fans didn’t like it. But despite overwhelmingly negative feedback from gamers as well as the industry, companies said they’d incorporate NFTs into future releases (or even shoehorn them into updates for existing titles). And the backlash only seemed to worsen with every announcement about NFTs.

When there’s money to be made, feedback can, and often does, go unheard. Still, a few major gaming companies did backtrack on their plans. So, what happened?

It seems that the lackluster performance of a few companies’ gaming NFT implementations may have caused some to reconsider their crypto efforts. From Ubisoft’s embarrassing attempt with Ubisoft Quartz, to Axie Infinity falling off the edge of the world, it’s easy to assume that the gaming-blockchain party ended before it really even began.

Setbacks or no, Ubisoft seems certain that NFTs have a role to play in the future of video games.

Well, it hasn’t. Pandora’s Box is now open, and the attempts to legitimize a potentially predatory monetization model aren’t going to stop any time soon.

But that’s still a while away. For now, let’s set the doom and gloom aside and take a look at where some of video games’ premier players stand:

Ubisoft

Ubisoft may not have put all its eggs in the NFT basket, but it is betting very heavily on the crypto space.

It certainly started down this path much before its rivals did. Ubisoft indicated its interest in the larger crypto space as one of the founding members of the Blockchain Gaming Alliance all the way back in 2018. And despite its intended audience fighting the company’s crypto plans every step of the way, it hasn’t slowed down.

The company launched a beta of Ubisoft Quartz last December, in what it said was a bid to demonstrate the value NFTs could bring to video games. But it appears to have done the exact opposite.



from TechCrunch
via Click me for Details

Russian Forces Flee From Ukraine's Snake Island On Speed Boats

You might remember this tiny island off the coast of Ukraine being captured by the Russians by a warship in the early days of the war when it was defended by only a handful of Ukrainians. That warship, the Moskva was sunk by the Ukrainians and was later commemorated with a stamp.

Source: Associated Press

SLOVIANSK, Ukraine (AP) — Russia on Thursday pulled back its forces from a strategically placed Black Sea island where they have faced relentless Ukrainian attacks, but kept up its push to encircle the last bulwark of Ukraine's resistance in the eastern province of Luhansk.

Russia's Defense Ministry said it withdrew its forces from the Zmiyinyy (Snake) Island off Ukraine's Black Sea port of Odesa in what it described as a “goodwill gesture.” Ukraine's military said the Russians fled the island in two speedboats following a barrage of Ukrainian artillery and missile strikes.

Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Lt. Gen. Igor Konashenkov insisted that the withdrawal was intended to demonstrate that “the Russian Federation wasn't hampering the United Nations' efforts to establish a humanitarian corridor for taking agricultural products from the territory of Ukraine.”

read more



from Latest articles from Crooks and Liars
via Click me for Details

What to look for when hiring a growth marketing agency

If you search for “growth marketing” roles on LinkedIn these days, it’s likely you’ll get over 15,000 results. Contrast that with just a few years ago, when LinkedIn would have yielded a significantly lower number for the same role.

The rapid expansion of the growth marketing industry has created a significant problem for startups looking to hire: There is a massive undersupply of good growth marketers.

After all, every startup, whether it’s trying to find product-market fit or an efficient way to deploy recent funding, is ultimately searching for a growth marketer.


TechCrunch+ is having an Independence Day sale! Save 50% on an annual subscription here.
(More on TechCrunch+ here if you need it!)


Growth marketer archetypes

Before diving into how hiring a growth marketing agency can help your startup, it’s important to understand the type of marketers you’ll find there.

There are three main criteria that will help you find the best fit:

  • Stage
  • Focus
  • Vertical

When assessing the skills of a growth marketer purely based on their experience, examining the stage of the companies they’ve worked at, their previous growth focus areas and verticals all become key.

The beauty of growth marketing is that you’ll find experts in many disciplines and strategies.

Stage

As a startup founder, your growth team needs someone who has already experienced scaling a company from the ground up. This knowledge shows that your growth marketer is scrappy and knows how to go from zero to one.

Conversely, if you’re a Series E company, you will probably want someone who has experience squeezing out additional incremental volume from ongoing efforts.

Focus

It’s crucial to understand which growth channels and mediums a growth marketer has worked with. You don’t want a LinkedIn expert if you’re a B2C startup looking to acquire users on Facebook and TikTok.



from TechCrunch
via Click me for Details

Wednesday, 29 June 2022

What downturn? The total cloud market reached $126B in Q1 2022

Imagine for a second that you could roll up the entire cloud market, everything from SaaS to infrastructure to platform, CDNs (content delivery networks), managed private clouds, data center rentals — everything. What would that be worth in a quarter?

Well, the folks at Synergy Research were kind enough to do the work for us and the figure the firm came up with was $126 billion for Q1 2022, up 26% over the prior year. That’s a lot of money, but consider that a significant portion of that, $44 billion, came from the infrastructure and platform segment, which was itself up 36% year over year.

Another major tranche of $54 billion came from three major categories that Synergy follows encompassing managed private cloud services, enterprise SaaS and CDN, leaving $28 billion divided up among the remaining categories — still nothing to sneeze at, mind you.

The astonishing part of all this is that John Dinsdale, who is research director at Synergy, is predicting that the cloud services portion (at the top of the chart) will double in three years, with the other parts of the market continuing to grow at a brisk pace.

Synergy Research showing total cloud market growth

Image Credits: Synergy Research

Dinsdale believes that cloud is likely to remain an attractive option even if there is an economic downturn. “The economy always impacts things in a variety of ways, both good and bad. But the thing about cloud services is that the fundamental benefit they bring is all about agility, flexibility and responsiveness,” he said.

“When the going gets tough financially, that can actually provide added impetus to shifting to the cloud. We will see continued strong growth in cloud services whatever the economic situation.”

The numbers at the top of the chart represent the different aspects of cloud services. The middle numbers are hardware sales to cloud data center providers, along with data center leasing, excluding hardware being sold to enterprises for private data centers. While the last third is looking at hyperscale data center growth, another key data point that shows that the world’s largest cloud providers need increasing amounts of data center real estate to support the growth of their businesses.

Dinsdale admitted that some of these categories can be confusing. “Managed private cloud can sometimes be a slightly confusing label, but these are services that are offered by public cloud providers as an alternative to more traditional on-premise solutions. The public cloud provider is hosting the services within their infrastructure,” he said.

He says the major difference between these offerings and more general public cloud is the customer gets dedicated resources. “There are various different flavors of managed private cloud, but the key is that the cloud provider infrastructure used to support a specific client is dedicated to that client and not shared; or in virtual private services workloads for an enterprise customer are clearly isolated from other enterprise customers. Bottom line is these are managed or hosted services that are provided by public cloud providers. The enterprise customers are not buying or owning their own cloud infrastructure,” he explained.

No matter how you define it, the cloud market is lucrative, it’s growing and it’s only going to do more so over time. Consider that a recent report issued by Snowflake found that just 25% of workloads were in the public cloud. That means there’s plenty of room for the cloud infrastructure players, especially the Big Three — Amazon, Microsoft and Google — to continue growing at a brisk pace for some time to come.

Further, the SaaS business model is also not going anywhere and continues to expand. The market leaders are Salesforce, Microsoft and Adobe in this category, but we are seeing this as the default business model for most startups.

Synergy puts together a variety of public reports throughout the year that are represented by each section of the graphic above. This is the first time they have rolled all of the data into a single report.

Savvy readers may note that we published a report in April citing $53 billion in total first-quarter cloud infrastructure revenue based on Synergy data. Dinsdale said that included the $44 billion cited in the roll up report, plus an additional $8 billion in hosted private cloud revenue.



from TechCrunch
via Click me for Details

Google’s Switch to Android app for iOS users is now compatible with all Android 12 phones

Google announced today that its Switch to Android app for iOS users is now compatible with all Android 12 phones. The iOS app, which launched earlier this year, makes the transition between the mobile platforms easier to manage by helping users import their contacts, calendar, photos and videos to their new Android phone. Prior to today’s expansion, the app was limited to Pixel phones.

The app initiates a transfer process by displaying a QR code on your iPhone that you can scan to start migrating your data over to your new Android phone. You will be prompted to connect your old iPhone with your new Android phone either with your iPhone cable or wirelessly via the new Switch to Android app.

In addition to moving data, the app offers other instructions about the transfer process, such as how to deregister iMessage in order to continue getting texts on the new Android device. The app will also give you tips for your new device, such as learning how to transfer photos from iCloud.

“Starting today, support for the Switch to Android app on iOS is rolling out to all Android 12 phones, so you can move over some important information from your iPhone to your new Android seamlessly,” said Liza Ma, a group product manager at Android, in a blog post. “Once you’ve got your new Android phone, follow our easy setup instructions to go through the data transfer process.”

Before the company introduced the app, Google’s suggested process for moving to Android from iPhone involved having users back up their contacts, calendar, photos and videos via the Google Drive iOS app before changing devices. The new Switch to Android app does the same thing, but in an easier and faster way.



from TechCrunch
via Click me for Details

Washington Examiner: Trump Is A Disgrace And Unfit For Power Again

Cassidy Hutchinson's damning under oath testimony is ricocheting off the walls of Republican brains even faster that I thought would be possible.

Andy McCarthy published a devastating piece against Trump after saying basically the same thing on Fox News during Tuesday's Select Committee hearing.

Now the right wing Washington Examiner also came out screaming about the treasonous ex-president.

In short, Hutchinson was a conservative Trumpist true believer and a tremendously credible one at that. She did not overstate things, did not seem to be seeking attention, and was very precise about how and why she knew what she related and about which testimony was firsthand and which was secondhand but able to be corroborated.

Many of those testifying worked for Trump or were part of his allies. Hutchinson was there up until the end.

Hutchinson’s testimony confirmed a damning portrayal of Trump as unstable, unmoored, and absolutely heedless of his sworn duty to effectuate a peaceful transition of presidential power. Considering the entirety of her testimony, it is unsurprising that Hutchinson said she heard serious discussions of Cabinet members invoking the 25th Amendment that would have at least temporarily evicted Trump from office.

read more



from Latest articles from Crooks and Liars
via Click me for Details

Disclose your Scope 3 emissions, you cowards

If you want the inside scoop on which companies are serious about addressing their carbon emissions and which aren’t, take a look at the public comments submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission regarding its proposed climate rule.

You can tell if a company is serious by its stance on so-called Scope 3 emissions. Depending on the business, Scope 3 emissions might make up a significant majority of a company’s carbon footprint. Such emissions can result from activities and assets a company doesn’t own or control, like leased office space, business travel or end-of-life processing of their products. They also might occur when customers use their products, like when someone drives their gas-powered SUV.

In short, if your company is serious about doing something about climate change, it should probably be estimating its Scope 3 emissions. If it’s making noise about being sustainable, at the very least it probably shouldn’t undermine attempts to make Scope 3 disclosures standard.


TechCrunch+ is having an Independence Day sale! Save 50% on an annual subscription here. (More on TechCrunch+ here if you need it!)


Which is why the comments on the SEC’s site make for some interesting reading. Companies ranging from Walmart and BlackRock to Fidelity, Gap, ExxonMobil and Southwest Airlines have made it clear that they’d rather not disclose their Scope 3 emissions, even with the safe harbor provisions the SEC is offering to limit liability. Those companies are effectively saying that they don’t take climate change seriously enough to fully understand — and disclose — their own impact on it.

There are many, many more companies that I’m not covering here that take a similar stance. So why am I singling these out? Walmart because it’s the world’s largest retailer. BlackRock and Fidelity because they’re the first- and third-largest asset managers. ExxonMobil because it’s the largest non-government-owned oil company. Gap because the company claims it “feel[s] an ethical responsibility to align our goals and strategies with the best science and industry practices,” according to its own climate values page. And Southwest because it is among the largest airlines in the U.S., no matter which measure you use.

Demur and delay

The arguments against disclosing Scope 3 data generally fall into three buckets: Companies complain that the data is too unreliable or uncertain, that it’s too hard to obtain or that it’ll expose them to lawsuits.

The first smells like a classic FUD campaign — fear, uncertainty and doubt. Cynthia Lo Bessette, Fidelity’s chief legal officer, told the SEC that Scope 3 data is “speculative, nascent, unreliable, and there are no current standards to ensure consistent and comparable data.”



from TechCrunch
via Click me for Details

Giuliani Throws Out Some Profanity After Mayor Adams Said He Filed A False Police Report

Daniel Gill, a 39-year-old ShopRite employee, was charged with second-degree assault after barely touching former Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani on the back. "I got hit on the back as if a boulder hit me," Giuliani said. "It knocked me forward a step or two. It hurt tremendously." That's not what happened, though, and there is a video to back that up. Rudy's story got more dramatic with each telling of the event.

Mayor Eric Adams said on Tuesday that Giuliani should be investigated for filing a false police report over the alleged assault, and that prompted the former mayor to tell Adams to "go f–k himself," the New York Post reports.

There is a self-entitlement with conservatives where they don't feel they should be held accountable for their misdeeds like the rest of us.

The mayoral smackdown began when Adams chided Giuliani for his "creativity and sensationalism" in claiming he could have been "killed" by the pat on the back he got while campaigning Sunday for his son, Andrew, a GOP gubernatorial candidate.

I can see Giuliani's death certificate now. Death by pat on the back. It happens all the time. Very sad stuff, really.

"I looked at the video, and someone needs to remind former Mayor Giuliani that falsely reporting a crime is a crime," Adams said.

read more



from Latest articles from Crooks and Liars
via Click me for Details

Baykar Donates Drones Ukrainians Wanted To Buy After Crowdfunding

Baykar company announced that they donate to Ukraine three Bayraktar TB2 drones, free of charge. The Bayraktar became famous in Ukraine after a silly but catchy song written and composed by Ukrainian soldier Taras Borovok became popular.

Source: Reuters

ISTANBUL, June 27 (Reuters) - Turkish defence firm Baykar said on Monday it would donate three unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to Ukraine, after a crowdfunding campaign there raised enough funds to buy "several" of the Bayraktar TB2 model.

The TB2 has been hugely popular in Ukraine, where it helped destroy Russian artillery systems and armoured vehicles. It even became the subject of a patriotic expletive-strewn hit song in Ukraine that mocked Russian troops, with the chorus "Bayraktar, Bayraktar".

Baykar said the crowdfunding campaign in Ukraine had reached the milestone in a few days and that business leaders as well ordinary people contributed to the fund.

"Baykar will not accept payment for the TB2s, and will send three UAVs free of charge to the Ukrainian war front," the company said in a statement.

"We ask that raised funds be remitted instead to the struggling people of Ukraine," it said.

The Kyiv Independent announcement on Twitter.

read more



from Latest articles from Crooks and Liars
via Click me for Details

Disney extends CEO Bob Chapek’s contract for three more years despite difficult tenure

Disney’s board unanimously voted to extend CEO Bob Chapek’s contract for three more years, the company announced yesterday. His current deal was set to expire in February 2023. Despite a chaotic tenure that began at the height of COVID, the new three-year agreement will begin Friday, July 1.

“Disney was dealt a tough hand by the pandemic, yet with Bob at the helm, our businesses—from parks to streaming—not only weathered the storm but emerged in a position of strength. In this important time of growth and transformation, the Board is committed to keeping Disney on the successful path it is on today, and Bob’s leadership is key to achieving that goal. Bob is the right leader at the right time for The Walt Disney Company, and the Board has full confidence in him and his leadership team,” said Susan Arnold, chairman of the board, in a statement.

The extension is Chapek’s chance to prove to the board, Wall Street and subscribers that he is capable of running a streaming business in this unpredictable climate and can overcome all the difficulties the company has been facing, including a stock loss of 38% year to date.

Disney stock has teetered more than its rivals. Netflix shares were down over 20% after losing 200,000 subscribers in the first quarter of 2022. Following the announcement of the new contract, Disney stock increased by 0.56% in late trading to $96.46. The lowest for the year was $92, and last fall, it was $186.

Chapek has felt the pressure to follow in former Disney CEO Bob Iger’s footsteps. Iger was Disney’s CEO since 2005 and is highly respected in Hollywood, especially for acquiring properties Pixar, Marvel and Lucasfilm.

It’s no secret that the new CEO hasn’t necessarily been welcomed with open arms. In September 2021, Chapek embarrassed Iger, who was still chairman then, when the new CEO was in a legal scuffle with Disney+ “Black Widow“ star Scarlett Johansson. Since then, Iger and Chapek’s relationship is estranged.

More recently, he has managed to frustrate employees with his initial lack of response to Florida’s anti-gay bill and the recent firing of Peter Rice, Disney’s most senior television content executive.

Chapek apologized for his silence on the bill after being slammed by Disney cast members who felt insulted by the decision. The chief executive officer publicly opposed the bill and announced the donation of $5 million to LGBTQ rights organizations. It was reported by accountability news site Popular Information that the Walt Disney Company previously donated more than $200,000 to politicians who sponsored Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill.

Peter Rice, who oversaw the Disney General Entertainment Content division and was supposedly Chapek’s replacement, was let go at the beginning of this month. According to The New York Times, sources report that he was an ill fit for the company’s “corporate culture.”

Earlier this month, Disney pulled a controversial move and passed on streaming rights to popular Indian Premier League cricket, which will make it harder for Disney’s Indian streaming service Hotstar to retain subscribers. The sporting event helped Hotstar gain millions of subscribers and break several global streaming records. The company was outbid by Viacom 18 and Times Internet.

The chief executive officer has achieved some milestones as well during his time at Disney. He has worked for the Walt Disney Company for nearly 30 years and is its seventh CEO. Previously the chairman of Disney’s Parks, Experiences, and Products division, Chapek took on a precarious position in 2020 when the pandemic forced the closing of movie theaters and theme parks. Despite having little revenue from these divisions, the company’s fledgling streaming service Disney+ has seen success with shows “The Mandalorian,” “The Book of Boba Fett,” “Obi-Wan Kenobi” and “Loki,” among others. The streaming service also announced that it will get a new affordable ad-supported tier this year, which will likely attract new subscribers.

While Chapek is bold for his goal of reaching 230 million to 260 million Disney+ subscribers by 2024, the service may still be on track. At the end of Disney’s fiscal second quarter, Disney+ had more than 137.7 million subscribers.

Bob Chapek stated, “Leading this great company is the honor of a lifetime, and I am grateful to the Board for their support. I started at Disney almost 30 years ago, and today have the privilege of leading one of the world’s greatest, most dynamic companies, bringing joy to millions around the world. I am thrilled to work alongside the incredible storytellers, employees, and cast members who make magic every day.”

The details of his new contract, including base salary, are still in the works. In an SEC filing, the company said the new contract will grant Chapek a long-term incentive award with a target value of “not less than $20 million annually.” Also, the proportion of his long-term incentive award comprised of performance-based restricted stock units will be boosted to 60%. According to the SEC filing, the awards don’t guarantee any minimum amount of compensation.



from TechCrunch
via Click me for Details

Tuesday, 28 June 2022

Hutchinson Reveals Trump's Response To His Mob Wanting To Hang Pence

Cassidy Hutchinson, a top aide to former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and whose office was just doors down from the Oval Office, is burning the whole place down today during the surprise Jan. 6 committee hearing. With so many spineless Republicans remaining silent about the deadly Jan. 6 insurrection, Hutchinson, 25, is someone that will go down in the history books as a brave and honest woman.

She revealed that former President Donald Trump ordered the Secret Service to remove magnetometers even though he knew that his mob of supporters were armed. Trump incited the insurrection. He knew that his unruly mob could kill someone. He said, "they're not here to hurt me."

True. They were there to murder Mike Pence. Of course, though, as most of you have probably figured out, Trump wanted Pence to suffer, too. Hutchinson testified under oath that Mark Meadows said 'something to the effect of, 'You heard him, Pat [Cipollone]. He thinks Mike [Pence] deserves it. He doesn't think they're doing anything wrong.'"

Ooof!

Trump is, of course, losing his mind on Truth Social, where he lies a lot. He says he hardly knew Hutchinson, the woman who had an office just yards away from his and worked closely with his chief of staff. He's left quite a few messages about the hearing today.

read more



from Latest articles from Crooks and Liars
via Click me for Details

OK, whose rocket just hit the moon?

You know you’re living in the space age when a rocket hits the moon, and the industry as a whole points to the sky and, like an angry teacher holding up a paper airplane, asks “Who launched this?!” Truly, that is what occurred this week as an unidentified rocket stage (!) impacted the lunar surface, forming a new and interesting crater and leaving us all wondering how it’s possible not to know what happened.

The short version of this story is that skywatchers led by Bill Gray had been tracking an object for months that, based on their calculations, would soon impact the moon. It was obviously a piece of rocket trash (rockets produce a ton of trash), but no one stepped up to say “yes, that’s ours, sorry about that.”

Based on their observations and discussions, these amateur (though by no means lacking in expertise) object trackers determined that it was most likely a SpaceX launch from 2015. But SpaceX didn’t cop to it, and after a while Gray and others, including NASA, decided it was more likely to be a 2014 launch out of China. China denied this is the case, saying the launch vehicle in question burned up on reentry.

Maybe they’re telling the truth; maybe they don’t want to be responsible for the first completely inadvertent lunar impact in history. Other spacecraft have struck the moon, but it was on purpose or part of a botched landing (in other words, the impact was intentional, just a little harder than expected) — not just a wayward piece of space junk.

Perhaps we’ll never know, and really, that’s the weirdest part of all. With hundreds of terrestrial telescopes and radars, space-based sensor networks and cameras pointing every which way — and that’s just the space monitoring we know about! — it seems amazing that a whole rocket stage managed to sit in orbit for six or seven years, eventually getting all the way to the moon, without being identified.

Animation by Tony Dunn showing the mystery object (green) orbiting and eventually impacting on the originally estimated March date. Image Credits: Tony Dunn

I thought someone at LeoLabs, which has been building a new network of debris-tracking radar all over the world, might have a little insight. Darren McKnight, senior technical fellow there, had the following answers to my questions.

How is it possible we didn’t know the identity and trajectory of such a large and relatively recently launched object?

Tracking derelict objects in cislunar orbit likely isn’t a high priority for government sensors when they can spend that time observing satellites or space junk that’s closer to Earth. However, tracking and monitoring of operational satellites in cislunar orbit, indeed, is critical to strategic intelligence, as it is new high ground.

Would confusion like this be possible for an object launched now?

Yes, this could happen again now as the technology used by the U.S. government to track space objects has not changed in many years.

Are there likely to be more of these “mystery objects” making impacts here and there over the next few years?

It’s possible an accidental moon-strike like this could happen again in the future, depending on the number of missions that put rocket bodies into those orbits and given enough time (years or decades). But events like this should generally stay exceedingly rare.

And as Bill Gray notes in his write-up:

… High-altitude junk has been of no concern to anybody outside the asteroid surveys, and even we haven’t been all that fussed about it. Objects of this sort are not tracked by the US Space Force; they (mostly) use radar, which is ‘near-sighted’: it can track objects four inches/10 cm across in low orbits, but can’t see big rocket stages like this when they’re as far away as the moon. You need telescopes for that.

Strange as it seems (to me, anyway), orbits are computed for objects of this sort only by me, in my spare time.


It’s remarkable in a way, but as anyone in the space monitoring world will tell you, there’s a lot to look at up there and you have to pick your targets. A rocket-sized object halfway to the moon is not simple or easy to get a good image of.

Our best clue as to the object’s identity may actually be the crater it left when it hit. The impact location was imaged shortly afterward and it has a curious double-O shape to it: two overlapping craters, one 18 meters across and the other 16 meters. Here’s the before and after:

“The double crater was unexpected and may indicate that the rocket body had large masses at each end. Typically a spent rocket has mass concentrated at the motor end; the rest of the rocket stage mainly consists of an empty fuel tank,” NASA’s Mark Robinson wrote.

Although it’s an enticing mystery, the truth is there doesn’t seem to be much reason to dedicate any serious resources to figuring it out. Stranger things happen in space than a chunk of a rocket flying off at exactly the angle and speed necessary to eventually strike the moon. And for all we know someone out there is well aware of what this weird, double-ended piece of space junk is but would rather keep it quiet.



from TechCrunch
via Click me for Details

Giuliani And Meadows Asked Trump For Pardons Related To January 6th

Former top aide to Trump White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, Cassidy Hutchinson. testified that two high-ranking members of Trump's team asked for pardons for January 6th.

Liz Cheney asked, "Ms Hutchinson, Did Rudy Giuliani ever suggest that he was interested in receiving a presidential pardon related to January 6?"

Hutchinson replied, "He did."

Again Liz Cheney asked, "Ms. Hutchinson, did White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows ever indicate that he was interested in receiving a presidential pardon related to January 6?"

"Mr. Meadows did seek that pardon, yes ma'am," Hutchinson replied.

There we have it.

Rudy Giuliani, the most prominent election fraud conspiracy theorist in Trump World and Trump's COS Mark Meadows both asked for pardons related to the insurrection on January 6.

You only ask for a pardon if you know you're guilty.

The first thing Hutchinson testified to was the smoking gun: Rudy and Meadows both knew January 6th was going to be violent as far back as January 2nd. Of course they wanted a pardon.

read more



from Latest articles from Crooks and Liars
via Click me for Details

Volkswagen, Siemens invest $450M into Electrify America in EV charging push

Volkswagen Group subsidiary Electrify America said Tuesday it raised $450 million in a deal that includes its first external investor as it aims to accelerate its rollout of ultra-fast charging stations in the U.S. and Canada.

The deal, which values North America’s largest ultra-fast EV charging network at $2.45 billion, includes more than $100 million from German industrial company Siemens and additional capital from VW Group.

The money will help Electrify America toward its goal of more than doubling its footprint to 10,000 ultra-fast chargers across 1,800 charging stations in both countries by 2026. The company currently operates 3,500 ultra-fast chargers at 800 stations.

Siemens, now a minority shareholder with a seat on the board, will invest “a low triple-digit USD amount” as the charging company’s first outside investor, Electrify America said.

Meanwhile, Volkswagen said it plans to increase its capital investment in Electrify America beyond its original commitment of $2 billion through 2026. A VW spokesman described the amount as “an incremental investment” but declined to provide details.

The new investment comes at a precarious time for automakers trying to sell EVs. The lack of charging stations is one of the main bottlenecks to the mass adoption of electric vehicles.

The challenge is especially dire in the U.S., which “requires a sixfold increase in average annual public charging installations over the next four years” to meet federal benchmarks, according to the 2022 Bloomberg Intelligence Global Battery-Electric Vehicles Outlook released in June.

A big push is needed to scale up the industry quick enough so charging infrastructure is installed in time to support the expected electric vehicle fleet,” the report said.

The sector has picked up steam since President Joe Biden signed an infrastructure bill in November earmarking $7.5 billion for a national network of half a million EV chargers, which many established and startup EV charging companies have been scaling and consolidating operations.

Strategic deals in June includes Blink Charging’s $200 million purchase of SemaConnect and the acquisition of EV Connect by French energy company Schneider Electric for an undisclosed sum.



from TechCrunch
via Click me for Details

Trump Wanted Magnetometers Removed So Weapons Would Go To Capitol

Cassidy Hutchinson testified that Trump ordered Secret Service to remove magnetometers so that his supporters could carry weapons at his rally and to the Capitol, because, "they're not here to hurt me."

Holy shite.

This proves Trump wanted violence to occur after his Stop The Steal rally on January 6th, and during his speech told the MAGA crowd to march down to the Capitol armed.

Trump was worried he couldn't get all his seditious creeps into the rally and when he because they were armed.

Hutchinson: Because the rally space was not full. one of the reasons, which I previously stated was because he wanted it to be full, and for people to not feel excluded and he felt the mags were at fault for not letting everybody in.

(Magnetometers are used to detect metal objects, such as concealed handguns.)

Hutchinson: I was part of a conversation. i was in the vicinity of a conversation where I heard the president say something to the effect of, you know, 'I don't care that they have weapons. They're not here to hurt me. Take the f-ing mags away, let the people in, take the f-ing mags away.'

OMG.

Trump wanted the Secret Service to allow weapons into his rally and to be taken to the protest at the US Capitol! They refused, thankfully, but those people with weapons were still nearby.

read more



from Latest articles from Crooks and Liars
via Click me for Details

Monday, 27 June 2022

How Cadillac plans to use its $300,000 Celestiq EV to rebuild the brand

The Cadillac Celestiq, the brand’s halo EV set to debut during Monterey Car Week in August, will reportedly start around $300,000, pushing it well above the top variants from other luxury EVs, including the Lucid Air Dream Edition, Porsche Taycan Turbo S and Tesla Model X Plaid.

While Cadillac would not confirm the eye-popping price tag, the GM brand did verify the role the Celestiq will play in fulfilling its electrified ambitions. “We are excited to share more information later this year and return Cadillac to the standard of the world,” spokesman Mike Albano told TechCrunch on Monday, noting that the company would not comment on the Celestiq price.

The phrase “standard of the world” suggests Cadillac has large-scale ambitions for the small-batch car. The price isn’t the only signal that Cadillac is aiming to create an exclusivity narrative around the Celestiq as the face of its future EVs. GM plans to only produce 500 of the luxury electric hatchbacks following the launch of the prototype at this summer’s Pebble Beach Concours d’Elegance.

The Cadillac Celestiq will test the brand’s power and cache in a market it once dominated, but lost to other competitors. A century ago, Cadillac represented the pinnacle of automotive luxury that Bentley and Rolls-Royce aspired to reach. But Cadillac soon began ceding sales to rivals, never quite regaining its mantle.

GM says that the Celestiq will begin production in late 2023 and go on sale in 2025. Until GM releases details, it’s difficult to gauge the demand for a $300,000 Cadillac.

The nameplate’s importance to GM is evident from the $81 million GM is investing to purchase and install equipment to hand-build the Celestiq at the Global Technical Center in Warren, Michigan.

Cadillac has not shared many details on the Celestiq, but a set of teaser images released in June show red-leather interior and meticulous detailing for the doors, seats, and center console.

The brand, which plans to go fully electric by 2030, is off to a strong start. Cadillac said that high demand for its first-ever EV, the $60,000 Cadillac Lyriq SUV, forced it to close its 2023 order book earlier than expected.

The time is right for Cadillac to stage a comeback.

“A fresh wave of electric vehicles provides Cadillac its best opportunity to rebrand itself to reach its goals as we see EV shoppers are more willing to try different brands since the market is still in its infant stages,” said Jessica Caldwell, executive director of insights at Edmunds. “The reality is very few people will be able to afford this vehicle in particular, but there will be plenty of curiosity about a vehicle commanding this price tag. And this level of buzz for a Cadillac model not called an Escalade hasn’t been seen in a while.”



from TechCrunch
via Click me for Details

Trump Squeals Like A Pig: Fake And Doctored Videos!

During a rally in Illinois on Saturday, Traitor Trump launched into a conspiratorial rant against the explosive testimony against his attempted coup being delivered to the America people from the Select Committee investigating the insurrection at the US Capitol on January 6.

The Cockwobbler was really mad that the Senate didn't pass a bill protecting the Supreme Court justices from protestors.

But for the five dead officers during the insurrection at his incitement meaning, he's got nothing. Has he ever even mentioned their sacrifice?

"Radical Democrats staging a ridiculous fake trial over January 6," Trump yelled at his cultists.

Trump uses so many adjectives to describe Democrats and the hearings, it's like Frank Luntz made a thesaurus stew and Trump, without looking, plucks them out for his word salad menagerie of ridiculous right-wing tropes.

"Pushing a fake and fabricated narrative based on doctored video lies and testimony that is totally uncontested.. the lies are unbelievable," he grumbled.

Poor baby. His fee fees are hurt.

Trump, it's not an actual trial. it's a Congressional Committee uncovering evidence against your illegal plot to overthrow a free and fair election.

read more



from Latest articles from Crooks and Liars
via Click me for Details

Perceptron: Analyzing images in the blink of an eye and tracking the lifecycle of snow

Research in the field of machine learning and AI, now a key technology in practically every industry and company, is far too voluminous for anyone to read it all. This column, Perceptron (previously Deep Science), aims to collect some of the most relevant recent discoveries and papers — particularly in, but not limited to, artificial intelligence — and explain why they matter.

This week in AI, engineers at Penn State announced that they’ve created a chip that can process and classify nearly two billion images per second. Carnegie Mellon, meanwhile, has signed a $10.5 million U.S. Army contract to expand its use of AI in predictive maintenance. And at UC Berkeley, a team of scientists is applying AI research to solve climate problems, like understanding snow as a water resource.

The Penn State work aimed to overcome the limitations of traditional processors when applied to AI workloads — specifically recognizing and classifying images or the objects in them. Before a machine learning system can process an image, it must be captured by a camera’s image sensor (assuming it’s a real-world image), converted by the sensor from light to electrical signals, and then converted again into binary data. Only then can the system sufficiently “understand” the image to process, analyze, and classify it.

Penn State engineers including postdoctoral fellow Farshid Ashtiani, graduate student Alexander J. Geers, and associate professor in electrical and systems engineering Firooz Aflatouni designed a workaround that they claim removes the most time-consuming aspects of traditional chip-based AI image processing. Their 9.3-square-millimeter custom processor directly processes light received from an “object of interest” using what they call an “optical deep neural network.”

3D Rendering,Computer board with circuits and chip

Essentially, the researchers’ processor uses “optical neurons” interconnected using optical wires, known as waveguides, to form a deep network of many layers. Information passes through the layers, with each step helping to classify the input image into one of its learned categories. Thanks to the chip’s ability to compute as light propagates through it and read and process optical signals directly, the researchers claim that the chip doesn’t need to store information and can perform an entire image classification in roughly half a nanosecond.

“We aren’t the first to come up with technology that reads optical signals directly,” Geers said in a statement, “but we are the first to create the complete system within a chip that is both compatible with existing technology and scalable to work with more complex data.” He expects the work will have applications in automatically detecting text in photos, helping self-driving cars recognize obstacles, and other computer vision-related tasks.

Over at Carnegie Mellon, the college’s Auton Lab is focused on a different set of use cases: applying predictive maintenance techniques to everything from ground vehicles to power generators. Supported by the aforementioned contract, Auton Lab director Artur Dubrawski will lead an effort to conduct fundamental research to broaden the applicability of computer models of complex physical systems, known as digital twins, to many domains.

Digital twin technologies aren’t new. GEAWS and other companies offer products that allow customers to model digital twins of machines. London-based SenSat creates digital twin models of locations for construction, mining and energy projects. Meanwhile, startups like Lacuna and Nexar are building digital twins of entire cities.

But digital twin technologies share the same limitations, chief among them inaccurate modeling proceeding from inaccurate data. As elsewhere, it’s garbage in, garbage out.

To address this and other blockers to bringing digital twins into wider use, Dubrawski’s team is collaborating with a range of stakeholders, such as clinicians in intensive care, to explore scenarios including in health care. The Auton Lab aims to develop new, more efficient methods of “capturing human expertise” so that AI systems can understand contexts not well-represented in data, as well as methods for sharing that expertise with users.

One thing AI may soon have that some people seem to lack is common sense. DARPA has been funding a number of initiatives at different labs that aim to imbue robots with a general sense of what to do if things aren’t quite right when they’re walking, carrying something, or gripping an object.

Ordinarily these models are quite brittle, failing miserably as soon as certain parameters are exceeded or unexpected events occur. Training “common sense” into them means they will be more flexible, with a general sense of how to salvage a situation. These aren’t particularly high-level concepts but just smarter ways of handling them. For instance, if something falls outside expected parameters, it can adjust other parameters to counteract it even if they aren’t specifically designed to do that.

This doesn’t mean robots are going to go around improvising everything — they just won’t fail quite so easily or so hard as they currently do. The current research shows that locomotion on rough terrain is better, shifting loads are carried better, and unfamiliar objects are gripped better when “common sense” training is included.

The research team at UC Berkeley, by contrast, is lasering in on one domain in particular: climate change. The Berkeley AI Research Climate Initiative (BAIR) — which launched recently, organized by computer science doctoral candidates Colorado Reed and Medhini Narasimhan and computer science doctoral student Ritwik Gupta — seeks partners among climate experts, government agencies, and industry to achieve goals meaningful for both climate and AI.

One of the first projects the initiative plans to tackle will use an AI technique to combine measurements from aircraft observations of snow and openly available weather and satellite data sources. AI will help to track the lifecycle of snow, which isn’t currently possible without great effort, enabling the researchers to estimate and predict how much water is in the snow in the Sierra Nevada mountains — and forecast the impact on the region’s streamflow.

A press release detailing the BAIR’s efforts notes that the state of snow impacts public health and the economy. Approximately 1.2 billion people rely on snow melt globally for water consumption or other purposes, and the Sierra mountains alone provide water for over half of California’s population.

Any technology or research done by the climate initiative will be openly published and won’t be exclusively licensed, Trevor Darrel, BAIR’s co-founding director and a Berkeley computer science professor, said.

A chart showing CO2 output of different AI model training processes.

AI itself is a contributor to climate change as well, though, as it takes enormous computing resources to train models like GPT-3 and DALL-E. The Allen Institute for AI (AI2) did a study on how these training periods could be done intelligently in order to reduce their impact on the climate. It’s not a trivial calculation: where electricity is coming from is constantly in flux and peaky usage like a day-long supercomputing run can’t just be split up to run next week when the sun is out and solar power is plentiful.

AI2’s work looks at the carbon intensity of training various models at various locations and times, part of a larger project at the Green Software Foundation to reduce the footprint of these important but energy-hogging processes.

Last but not least, OpenAI this week revealed Video PreTraining (VPT), a training technique that uses a small amount of labeled data to teach an AI system to complete tasks like how to craft diamond tools in Minecraft. VPT entails searching the web for videos and having contractors produce data (e.g., 2,000 hours of videos labeled with mouse and keyboard actions), and then training a model to predict actions given past and future video frames. In the last step, the original videos from the web are labeled with the contractor data to train a system to predict actions given only past frames.

OpenAI used Minecraft as a test case for VPT, but the firm claims that the approach is quite general — representing a step toward “general computer-using agents.” In any case, the model is available in open source, as well as the contractor data OpenAI procured for its experiments.



from TechCrunch
via Click me for Details

Jan 6 Committee Announces A VERY Last Minute Tuesday Hearing

The January 6th Committee just announced that they are holding a hearing to "hear witnesses and present newly-discovered evidence" TOMORROW at 1pm. This urgent and and hastily scheduled hearing is raising a LOT of questions on social media and in the news. No one knows the topic or a witness list. And Congress is on vacation, so having everyone come back to set this up with less than 24 hours notice is really unusual to see in a city like Washington, D.C..

Twitter had a lot of thoughts:

Sunday, 26 June 2022

It's A Bench, Not A Throne

With the overturning of Roe, the United States Supreme Court unveiled themselves to be a weaponized right wing political machine instead of a body of law designed to uphold justice. Politics Girl is mad as hell about this and she goes on to detail the illegitimacy of the court.

Open thread below...

read more



from Latest articles from Crooks and Liars
via Click me for Details

Deliveree is smoothing Southeast Asia’s bumpy logistics landscape

Logistics in much of Southeast Asia is not only complicated, but also expensive. Deliveree wants to solve that problem with a platform that not only lets clients book trucks, but also uses algorithms to determine the best route based on location, trucking loads and even the weather. The company announced today that it has raised a $70 million Series C led by Gobi Partners and SPIL Ventures, with participation from returning investor Inspire Ventures. This brings the company’s total raised so far to $109 million since it was founded in 2015.

The high cost of logistics means consumers end up paying higher prices, said founder and CEO Tom Kim. “The way we see the market is that number one, the inefficiency in trucking and cargo shipping has driven up costs materially. Imagine you’re in California, Los Angeles, and buying a pair of Nike shoes. What portion of that sales cost is spent on logistics and transportation and warehousing? The answer is very well-documented. It’s about 8%. If you buy those same Nike shoes in China, the answer is about 15%. And if you buy the same Nike shoes in Indonesia, Thailand or the Philippines, the answer is going to be much closer to 25%, maybe upwards of 30%.”

The company says that in the past 24 months, it has grown its gross transaction value by 3.2x and will exceed $100 million this year. It currently has 500 employees, and 100,000 drivers on its platform.

Deliveree is currently available in Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand. It focuses primarily on large trucks that move commercial goods or large items. Kim said that based on Google Analytics, it gets more searched than other logistics companies. These include Waresix, Go Box, Kargo Tech and Logisly in Indonesia; Mober, Inteluck and TheLorry in the Philippines; and Giztik, TheLorry and Ezyhaul in Thailand.

Kim added that the logistics war is especially heated in Indonesia, where many logistics startups, like Waresix, have received funding.

“It’s where a lot of startups and disruptive technology in the space is being built, and it’s definitely a very active market,” he told TechCrunch. “There are all these well-known players, like Waresix or even Kargo Tech. The Philippines and Thailand are also interesting and great markets, but there are less players in the logistics space, especially cargo, trucking and freight.”

One of the problems that Deliveree solves is inefficient use of trucks. For example, trucks deliver a load of goods, but then return empty to the warehouses. If it’s part of Deliveree’s system, however, companies can book it to ship goods on its way back. That makes better use of the money spent on fuel, time and dispatch teams.

“There are an awful lot of empty trucks driving around in Thailand, the Philippine and Indonesia, because everyone has their own corporate fleets,” said Kim. “They do one-way delivery and the truck drives back empty. It’s even that way for long-distance deliveries, when you’re sending goods from one warehouse to some kind of facility in an other city. The same thing happens—you send the truck full one way and it comes back, sometimes hundreds of kilometers, empty.”

Deliveree solves these problems with a dynamic marketplace, that Kim says currently has tens of thousands of customers and vendors, including a combination of independent drivers and trucking companies. The marketplace’s technology, combined with its volume, can identify customers both ways on a truck’s journey so it rarely travels empty. The marketplace aggregates demand and determines optimal routes so trucks remain full. Kim said that before Deliveree came along, a 40% to 50% utilization rate was considered above average. With Deliveree’s marketplace, however, trucks can achieve up to a 80% utilization rate, thanks to Deliveree’s internally-generated data set, which is has been working on for five years.

“Even though it’s far from perfect, it gets smarter everyday because we do thousands of bookings every day, and it can make more accurate forecasts about the duration of the booking, the day of the week, the time of the day, even the weather. These are all things that have drastic impact on durations,” Kim said.

This also means warehouse has shorter waiting queues, because Deliveree’s algorithms can predict what loading and waiting times will be.

Most companies have their own fleets, which means hiring dispatch teams, admin teams, security teams, parking lots and security guards. This is still the prominent way it’s done, said Kim, and means a lot of overhead for companies. Kim said his argument when pitching Deliveree to companies is that they can de-leverage their balance sheets and book trucks on an asset-light basis like. That means they only pay for trucks when they need them. When the pandemic happened, revenue for many companies went down, and Kim said that led to more adoption of Deliveree as they tried to increase revenue. This increased adoption of Deliveree, as more companies tried to find ways to save money, to convert their fixed costs to variable costs.

Deliveree monetizes by charging a fee to the customer and splitting it with the carriers. Deliveree’s standard ratio is 80% to the independent trucker or trucking company, and a 20% commission for the company.

In a prepared statement, Gobi Partners managing director Kay Mok said, “Post-pandemic, we are moving into an inflationary environment plagued by supply chain issues. Deliveree has built the best tech platform for customers and this will enable them to optimize and lower total cost of operation for the logistics and shipping company.”



from TechCrunch
via Click me for Details